Demonstration to the International Community
"To the United States of America, we wish to express our sincere gratitude for the
ongoing efforts and the sanctions already applied against the institutional tyranny
manifested within the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil.
However, it is important to share with our friends that the STF is merely the 'tip of the
iceberg.'
We have recently launched a public petition demanding that the STF receive our claim
and comply with the law.
We are fully aware of the shield established by the Brazilian State and recognize the
historic opportunity now before us to ensure that truth and justice prevail.
The absence of an effective response from the Inter-American Commission on Human
Rights (IACHR) limits our range of action and compels us to seek alternatives capable
of providing both legal and institutional protection and effectiveness.
For this reason, we place ourselves at the disposal of the United States to share, under
U.S. jurisdiction, our entire body of evidence and the procedural rights attached to the
case, so that they may be integrated and utilized under U.S. law, strengthening
accountability not only of individuals but of the entire structure involved.
Our goal is to join efforts and contribute so that democracy and transparency, which
today remain confined to official discourse, may become a tangible reality for the
Brazilian people."
Raul Severo
CWB/PR – August 10, 2025
This is only the first section of a complete document filed for the STF’s review. The
remainder of the brief remains reserved. But what is provided here is already sufficient
to raise the question that no one in power wishes to answer: why not address the merits
I – INTRODUCTION
This memorandum presents, in a chronological, objective manner, and supported by
documentary evidence, the sequence of acts and omissions that constituted a continuous
estate and inheritance fraud, initiated before the death of Sérgio Vargas Severo and
maintained to the present day.
The Theory of the “Tibetan Filing,” applied here, holds that the unjustified refusal to
present essential documents — or the submission of incomplete, contradictory, or
unauthenticated documents — constitutes an Anticipated Confession of Obstruction,
authorizing a direct judgment on the merits without further evidentiary proceedings.
All facts reported are supported by official documents issued and signed by public
agencies and competent authorities. These documents, in themselves, reveal omissions,
contradictions, and procedural flaws that dispense with further instruction.
The timeline is real, ongoing, and contains serious irregularities that remain
unaddressed. Since the initial contacts, there has been no consistent, substantiated, and
proportional response to the evidence presented. No State representative has produced a
technical brief addressing: – Unperformed investigative actions; – “Pre-archivings” followed by reopening and re-archiving in the same order; – Deliberate omissions in analyzing already submitted and recorded evidence.
The simplest — and most absurd — argument is this:
A year after all these accusations, grave and classified as heinous crimes, there has not
even been an investigation, inquiry, or questioning. Either they accuse me of perjury (in
which case they should have prosecuted me), or they silently agree with me. And this
silence is a confession.
In Brazil, does a formal accuser go unpunished? Inaction in the face of accusations of
this magnitude erodes public trust. This, in itself, reinforces the urgency of a unified
decision by the Supreme Federal Court.
Raul Severo
CWB/PR- BR 8/15/2025
